From: Alex Corcoles Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2022 13:54:45 +0000 (+0200) Subject: Add article on Playwright vs. Selenium X-Git-Tag: 20240214-emacs~558 X-Git-Url: https://xn--ix-yja.es/gitweb/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=297319831cbf845a8f058094eb0a6700f56fc016;p=alex.git Add article on Playwright vs. Selenium --- diff --git a/programming/python/scraping_with_selenium_on_docker.md b/programming/python/scraping_with_selenium_on_docker.md index ec22ee5..61ba1c1 100644 --- a/programming/python/scraping_with_selenium_on_docker.md +++ b/programming/python/scraping_with_selenium_on_docker.md @@ -3,3 +3,5 @@ Don't use Selenium, use [Playwright](https://playwright.dev/python/): * Playwright automatically sets up headless browsers. * Provides convenient abstractions for locating elements in a page (mostly no XPath required. It can match "intelligently" using text). * Has a handy UI tool that records your actions in a browser and writes equivalent *readable* Playwright code. + +Further reading: https://new.pythonforengineers.com/blog/web-automation-dont-use-selenium-use-playwright/