From 250201b433c0a99f6cabcb2596bfe43f1a5a3968 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: alex Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2023 16:11:25 +0200 Subject: Moving to prod! --- .../content/2006/06/celuloide-trepidante.gmi | 52 ---------------------- 1 file changed, 52 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 blog_experiment/content/2006/06/celuloide-trepidante.gmi (limited to 'blog_experiment/content/2006/06/celuloide-trepidante.gmi') diff --git a/blog_experiment/content/2006/06/celuloide-trepidante.gmi b/blog_experiment/content/2006/06/celuloide-trepidante.gmi deleted file mode 100644 index 5ef68bd9..00000000 --- a/blog_experiment/content/2006/06/celuloide-trepidante.gmi +++ /dev/null @@ -1,52 +0,0 @@ -# Celuloide trepidante -2006-06-19 - -Aunque estoy semiretirado, One Fine Day In The Middle Of The Night [1] tiene muy buena pinta, veamos una cita sacada de aquí [2] : - -=> http://www.amazon.co.uk/exec/obidos/ASIN/0349112096/026-1065695-1112433 [1] One Fine Day In The Middle Of The Night -=> http://episteme.arstechnica.com/eve/forums/a/tpc/f/34709834/m/242000969731/r/668000969731#668000969731 [2] aquí - -> -> -> -> An action film establishes its own rules of gunplay. In some, every bullet -> is potentially lethal -- even the old shot to the shoulder can look -> worryingly close to the upper-chest area. But in others, machine guns can -> seem the least deadly weapon known to man. To illustrate, at one end of -> the spectrum there's your Tarantino movies: reputations aside, there's not -> *that* much gunplay, so when somebody lets off a shot, it's for real, and -> it's usually fatal. High bullet-deadliness quotient. At the other end, -> there's your John Woo movies: zillions of rounds goin' off an' the only -> thing they ever hit is glass. Low bullet-deadliness quotient. In a high -> BDQ film, if the baddie draws a bead on somebody, get ready for ketchup. -> In a low BDQ film, that's just a bad day for the janitor. And both types -> are fine by me, as long as the rules are followed consistently. -> -> - -(Al parecer se trata de una novela de acción donde el prota es un erudito de las pelis de tiros- algo así como Fanhunter, supongo) - -Por cierto, para mi la lista de mejores pelis de acción de la historia debería incluir como mínimo: - -* Los inmortales [3] (la uno. La uno, por Dios) -* La guerra de las galaxías [4] (así, en masa. Sobretodo Hoth, los duelos a sable y los raids en la Estrella de la Muerte) -* Aliens [5] (I say we take off and nuke the entire site from orbit. It's the only way to be sure [6]) -* Grupo Salvaje [7] (y es que hoy a duras penas consiguen estar al nivel de Peckinpah en el 69) -* Léon [8] -* La Jungla de Cristal [9] - -=> http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0091203/ [3] Los inmortales -=> http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0076759/ [4] La guerra de las galaxías -=> http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0090605/ [5] Aliens -=> http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0090605/quotes [6] I say we take off and nuke the entire site from orbit. It's the only way to be sure -=> http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0065214/ [7] Grupo Salvaje -=> http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0110413/ [8] Léon -=> http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0095016/ [9] La Jungla de Cristal - -Desde luego, hay muchas otras que merecen estar en la lista, y aún más con escenas totalmente memorables (pero vaya, ni Heat [10], ni Ronin [11], por poner dos ejemplos, logran sobreponerse a sus múltiples problemas existenciales pese a contar con algunas de las mejores escenas de acción del cine)- háganme caso, hay suficientes pelis de acción geniales para no tener que tragar escoria... - -postdata: posteriores investigaciones deberían seguir [12]. - -=> http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0113277/ [10] Heat -=> http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0122690/ [11] Ronin -=> http://ruthlessreviews.com/80actionguide.cfm [12] posteriores investigaciones deberían seguir \ No newline at end of file -- cgit v1.2.3