Subject: Migrate blog

From: alex <[email-masked]>
Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2026 21:47:23 +0100

Turns into a static site generator. All Gemini files with links have
been rewritten to be relative.

Closes: #731
Closes: #372
Closes: #28
---
 blog/content/laspelis/1022.mail | 47 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 47 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 blog/content/laspelis/1022.mail

(limited to 'blog/content/laspelis/1022.mail')

diff --git a/blog/content/laspelis/1022.mail b/blog/content/laspelis/1022.mail
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..bb28ea15
--- /dev/null
+++ b/blog/content/laspelis/1022.mail
@@ -0,0 +1,47 @@
+Return-Path: &lt;koalillo@...&gt;
+X-Sender: koalillo@...
+X-Apparently-To: [email-masked]
+Received: (qmail 87921 invoked from network); 3 Jun 2006 20:31:03 -0000
+Received: from unknown (66.218.66.167)
+  by m27.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 3 Jun 2006 20:31:03 -0000
+Received: from unknown (HELO n29b.bullet.scd.yahoo.com) (209.73.160.87)
+  by mta6.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 3 Jun 2006 20:31:03 -0000
+Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys
+Received: from [66.218.69.4] by n29.bullet.scd.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 03 Jun 2006 20:30:39 -0000
+Received: from [66.218.66.66] by t4.bullet.scd.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 03 Jun 2006 20:30:39 -0000
+Date: Sat, 03 Jun 2006 20:30:38 -0000
+To: [email-masked]
+Message-ID: &lt;e5srhe+qiom@...&gt;
+User-Agent: eGroups-EW/0.82
+MIME-Version: 1.0
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=&quot;ISO-8859-1&quot;
+Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
+X-Mailer: Yahoo Groups Message Poster
+X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: groups-compose
+X-Yahoo-Post-IP: 212.170.16.33
+From: &quot;koalillo&quot; &lt;koalillo@...&gt;
+Subject: gafapastoso - Thumbsucker
+X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=99068668; y=ToJ--8XawtE_xgO1YdY-UI6w3l98Yc8vJe5erHEoSd1GCvo
+X-Yahoo-Profile: koalillo
+
+Las costumbres orales de un adolescente y un metaf=F3rico pulgar son el
+pun=
+to de partida de otra peli sobre la adolescencia y dem=E1s traumas.
+El inte=
+resant=EDsimo reparto aguanta la pel=EDcula muy bien, luchando
+contra el re=
+cargado estilo del director (fogueado, como no, en los
+videoclips) y un gui=
+=F3n indeciso y dubitativo. El resultado es desigual
+y si bien se le apreci=
+an m=E1s virtudes que defectos, la peli peca
+demasiado de ambiciosa y de su=
+puesta inteligencia para que la
+juzguemos con m=E1s benevolencia- aunque le=
+ concederemos el m=E9rito de
+que Keanu Reeves componga un dentista tan inte=
+resante.
+
+
+
+
-- 
cgit v1.2.3