diff options
| author | alex <alex@pdp7.net> | 2023-10-13 16:02:34 +0200 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | alex <alex@pdp7.net> | 2023-10-13 16:03:35 +0200 |
| commit | 87df74b49c8792e9dddd550d862b2cfa9a2e909b (patch) | |
| tree | ce1013a2f9a4ac79a6f6e4d94b857c2900dead11 /blog_experiment/content/2006/12/plasmar.gmi | |
| parent | 4f86ec0553d659fe3253a92657d85a96734d0048 (diff) | |
Adapt to new layout
Diffstat (limited to 'blog_experiment/content/2006/12/plasmar.gmi')
| -rw-r--r-- | blog_experiment/content/2006/12/plasmar.gmi | 18 |
1 files changed, 18 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/blog_experiment/content/2006/12/plasmar.gmi b/blog_experiment/content/2006/12/plasmar.gmi new file mode 100644 index 00000000..74f1f37b --- /dev/null +++ b/blog_experiment/content/2006/12/plasmar.gmi @@ -0,0 +1,18 @@ +# Plasmar +2006-12-08 + +Veo aquí [1] un enlace a la recopilación de fotos del año según Reuters [2]. + +Yo me quedo con la 2 [3] (ohhh... pretty colours...), 6 [4] (Esópico), 8 [5] (impagable el careto), 17 [6] (hmmm... heads), 18 [7] (no sabía que fueran capaces de hacer eso), 26 [8] (icónico) y 32 [9] (¿el nuevo Bond?). + +Lo que más me preocupa es que muchas de las de Bush me encantan... + +=> http://jroller.com/page/neugens?entry=photo_of_the_year [1] aquí +=> http://today.reuters.com/ [2] Reuters +=> http://www.repubblica.it/2006/05/gallerie/esteri/reuters-foto-anno/2.html [3] 2 +=> http://www.repubblica.it/2006/05/gallerie/esteri/reuters-foto-anno/6.html [4] 6 +=> http://www.repubblica.it/2006/05/gallerie/esteri/reuters-foto-anno/8.html [5] 8 +=> http://www.repubblica.it/2006/05/gallerie/esteri/reuters-foto-anno/17.html [6] 17 +=> http://www.repubblica.it/2006/05/gallerie/esteri/reuters-foto-anno/18.html [7] 18 +=> http://www.repubblica.it/2006/05/gallerie/esteri/reuters-foto-anno/26.html [8] 26 +=> http://www.repubblica.it/2006/05/gallerie/esteri/reuters-foto-anno/32.html [9] 32
\ No newline at end of file |