diff options
| author | alex <alex@pdp7.net> | 2023-10-13 16:11:25 +0200 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | alex <alex@pdp7.net> | 2023-10-13 16:11:25 +0200 |
| commit | 250201b433c0a99f6cabcb2596bfe43f1a5a3968 (patch) | |
| tree | 8dc5de16ed4315b3ab4fcc001b7dbd74d475c4b3 /blog_experiment/content/2006/12/plasmar.gmi | |
| parent | 1a80ac63854ba4ea28f81194ad15314771e979d5 (diff) | |
Moving to prod!
Diffstat (limited to 'blog_experiment/content/2006/12/plasmar.gmi')
| -rw-r--r-- | blog_experiment/content/2006/12/plasmar.gmi | 18 |
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 18 deletions
diff --git a/blog_experiment/content/2006/12/plasmar.gmi b/blog_experiment/content/2006/12/plasmar.gmi deleted file mode 100644 index 74f1f37b..00000000 --- a/blog_experiment/content/2006/12/plasmar.gmi +++ /dev/null @@ -1,18 +0,0 @@ -# Plasmar -2006-12-08 - -Veo aquí [1] un enlace a la recopilación de fotos del año según Reuters [2]. - -Yo me quedo con la 2 [3] (ohhh... pretty colours...), 6 [4] (Esópico), 8 [5] (impagable el careto), 17 [6] (hmmm... heads), 18 [7] (no sabía que fueran capaces de hacer eso), 26 [8] (icónico) y 32 [9] (¿el nuevo Bond?). - -Lo que más me preocupa es que muchas de las de Bush me encantan... - -=> http://jroller.com/page/neugens?entry=photo_of_the_year [1] aquí -=> http://today.reuters.com/ [2] Reuters -=> http://www.repubblica.it/2006/05/gallerie/esteri/reuters-foto-anno/2.html [3] 2 -=> http://www.repubblica.it/2006/05/gallerie/esteri/reuters-foto-anno/6.html [4] 6 -=> http://www.repubblica.it/2006/05/gallerie/esteri/reuters-foto-anno/8.html [5] 8 -=> http://www.repubblica.it/2006/05/gallerie/esteri/reuters-foto-anno/17.html [6] 17 -=> http://www.repubblica.it/2006/05/gallerie/esteri/reuters-foto-anno/18.html [7] 18 -=> http://www.repubblica.it/2006/05/gallerie/esteri/reuters-foto-anno/26.html [8] 26 -=> http://www.repubblica.it/2006/05/gallerie/esteri/reuters-foto-anno/32.html [9] 32
\ No newline at end of file |